Arrogant Offseason Leads To Week 7 Running Back Change For Cowboys ✭
Connect with us

Arrogant Offseason Leads To Week 7 Running Back Change For Cowboys

Cowboys Blog - Arrogant Offseason Leads To Week 7 Running Back Change For Cowboys 1

Star Blog

Arrogant Offseason Leads To Week 7 Running Back Change For Cowboys

“We didn’t put the priority on taking a back… I wouldn’t say it’s a priority right now” ~ DallasCowboys.com – May 6, 2015

“We don’t have that as a must to come out of here with a running back” ~ USA Today – April 28, 2015

“When you say the entire running game (…) we’re better (in 2015)” ~ NFL.com – May 14, 2015

“Garrett went on to state the Cowboys feel good with their current running back corps, making it easier to avoid using one of their eight picks on an RB.” ~ Star-Telegram.com – May 2, 2015

What a difference 6 months makes. Those 4 quotes are from 4 separate articles written in the span of about 14 days between the end of April and the beginning of May. An aggressive arrogance and sunshiny optimism that now leaves a supposed Super Bowl contender looking for a spark to turn around a disappointing 2-3 start.

Aggressive arrogance and sunshiny optimism are usually reserved for fans (guilty of it myself from time to time) but when it bleeds into a front office, you have serious problems.

It’s been said that there is no more popular football player than a team’s backup quarterback, but for years now, the Cowboys and their fans have fallen victim to reserve running back envy.

It started with Troy Hambrick in 2002, followed by ReShard Lee in 2004, then Marion Barber in 2007, Felix Jones in 2008-2010, and finally Joseph Randle in 2014.

In each of those seasons, fans clamored for the reserve running back to supplant the starter. When it happened – except for ReShard Lee, who never started – fans and coaches were ultimately disappointed.

That’s one part of it; sunshiny optimism leading you to believe that reserve players can easily make the jump to the starting lineup. That can be detrimental, but it’s ultimately the aggressive arrogance that led to the Christine Michael Hail Mary.

Cowboys Twitter gloated all offseason about Dallas’ unstoppable offensive line, with the common refrain being that anyone could run behind them and get 1,200 yards. What stunningly played out is that the Cowboys coaching staff and front office actually believed this, taking what was an internet meme and choosing to implement it as actual strategy on the field.

It was a terrible miscalculation and an absolutely reckless orchestration of the roster.

Cowboys Blog - Arrogant Offseason Leads To Week 7 Running Back Change For Cowboys

New Dallas running back Christine Michael (30) talks with head coach Jason Garrett during Dallas Cowboys practice at Valley Ranch in Irving, Texas on Wednesday, September 9, 2015. (Louis DeLuca/The Dallas Morning News)

Christine Michael may very well be an effective option at running back. He may step on the field Sunday against the Giants and reel off 125 yards and two touchdowns, which would be great. But the fact that the Cowboys are now relying on an opening week trade of a conditional draft pick should tell you all you need to know about the front office’s offseason defeat.

Jason Garrett and Stephen Jones are coming out of the bunker, hands raised, and acknowledging that they’ve lost.

As Cowboys fans, we should hope this is nothing more than a lost battle, and that the team will ultimately win the war when Dez Bryant and Tony Romo return. But as it stands, the arrogant assessment of the running game and the offensive line has been one of the biggest contributing factors to a largely disappointing season for the “win-now” 2015 Dallas Cowboys.

Bobby has served as host of Cowboys Cast since its inception in the spring of 2015. He’s a veteran of the radio industry and has worked on numerous nationally syndicated talk programs as both a technical director and producer. A lifelong Cowboys fan and pseudo-historian of the team, Bobby has built up an extensive collection over the years of original game broadcasts from the 70s, 80s, and 90s. His knowledge of the game and the Dallas Cowboys team make him the Cowboys Cast resident Cowboys Historian.

2 Comments
  • http://www.facebook.com/DallasCowboyBooksBlog Fred Goodwin

    Amen, Bobby.

    But what was the alternative? Everybody agrees that breaking the bank to keep DeMarco was not an option, and as much as I wanted Murray to stay, I agree we couldn’t afford to keep him.

    So what were Stephen and Jerry supposed to do differently?

  • Bobby

    Drafting Chaz Green in the third round was a pretty big mistake, even before the injury because he’s absolutely never been healthy. Unnecessary risk with some running back talent still on the board.

    CJ Spiller or Ryan Matthews would also have been acceptable options in free agency.

Reader Survey

Want to help make Inside The Star better?

We’re collecting feedback from our readers about the site. It only takes <2 minutes to complete, and can be done from any device.

> Take the survey now

Don’t worry, your information will not be shared with anyone but me (Bryson T.).

Cowboys News Feed App for Android

Popular Now

Advertisement

From Our Partners

Advertisement
Enjoy 40% commissions on officially licensed products as a FanPrint affiliate. You can even make your own, fully licensed Cowboys and player designs! Get started here
To Top