Yeah, just ignore the slow start and INT thrown by Dak in the Packers game. Yet, blow smoke up the readers' behinds about how he "almost led a comeback". The Packers went conservative on offense and defense, letting him come back. As soon as it started getting closer, they clamped down enough to slow the bleeding and still won by 16 points. The Dak led offense managed 0 points in the 1st Qtr, 7 in the 2nd Qtr, 9 in the 3rd Qtr. It wasn't until the GB D went conservative (with a 48-16 lead) that Dak managed to put up 16 more points.

Granted, the D imploded in the 2nd Qtr as Dan Quinn stubbornly stuck with the changes that he made specifically for this game (man vs zone). Dak giving them a short field to start the 2nd Qtr surely didn't help.

But, to completely shift the blame off of Dak's shoulders and onto the D is disingenuous at best.