Dont Believe The Hype Over Tony Romo’s Contract

    In the days since Tony Romo's much-lauded press conference there's been plenty of speculation about his future. While the possibility of lingers, the general consensus is that he will be be starting for another NFL team in 2017.

    Obviously, one of two things will have to happen for Romo to join a new club; he will have to be traded or released from his Cowboys contract. As you can imagine, there are major implications when a franchise is involved.

    Unfortunately, even some of the biggest personalities in sports don't quite understand how it works.

    Skip spends a lot of time with his head up his own ass, so it's not a surprise that he may not understand the intricacies of the NFL salary cap. Unfortunately, these inaccurate statements create ripples throughout the NFL universe and leave fans confused.

    Here are some of the prevalent myths about 's contract and how it will affect the Cowboys salary cap going forward. Let's bust 'em up, starting with Skip's false statement.

    Myth #1 – Trading Romo Creates Lots of Cap Space

    One of the biggest misconceptions out there is that trading a player has a different effect on the salary cap than releasing them. Unfortunately, this is not the case. It is effectively the same transaction when it comes to your cap. The only difference is that you get a draft pick or player for you trouble.

    Whether he's traded or released, Tony Romo will still cause $19.6 million in dead money. There won't be any fantastic post-Romo spending spree in 2017.

    Myth #2 – Romo Will Cost Us More Money if Traded/Released

    Cowboys Blog - Cowboys vs. Redskins Recap: Last minute win, last game for Romo?I've seen several freaking out about that $19 million as if it creates financial chaos for the Cowboys. That couldn't be farther from the truth.

    If he was still on the roster in 2017, Tony Romo would count $24.7 million against the salary cap. His or actually cut his cap hit down by $5.1 million dollars, giving us back that much in usable cap space.

    Remember, nobody thought was going to become the Cowboys starter this soon. Dallas has done its salary cap planning based on the assumption that Romo was still going to be here in 2017. Now they will actually have $5 million more to spend than they were likely expecting.

    Myth #3 – Romo's Cap Hit Goes Away if He Retires

    Another misguided viewpoint; Romo's dead money remains the same even if he retires. It's really no different than a trade or release. It's called “guaranteed money” for a reason.

    Teams have sued players to recoup bonus money in the past but have to cite fairly egregious breaches of contract to win. An example of this would be if the Cowboys wanted to sue for the bonus they gave him in 2016.

    Obviously, Dallas would never do this to Tony Romo.

    ✭ ✭ ✭ ✭ ✭

    Here's what you need to know about Tony Romo's contract and the ' salary cap, courtesy of It's really not that complicated.

    Romo's $19.6 million in dead money will either be absorbed in 2017 or can be split between 2017 and 2018. If split, he will count $10.7 million against next year's cap and then $8.9 million in 2018.

    Cowboys Headlines - Tony Romo: Whatever Comes Next, Thank You For 10 Great YearsIf Dallas eats the entire dead money hit next year, they will still have $5.1 million in extra cap space than if Romo was still on the roster. If they split the dead money, the cap space jumps up to $14 million in 2017.

    Remember, Dak Prescott counts next to nothing against the cap while under his rookie contract. Dallas has the luxury to eat the money from Romo's deal because they're not paying anything for his replacement.

    Dallas will certainly have a choice to make about splitting the dead money or absorbing it all in 2017. It's going to come down to how many moves they anticipate making next year, both internal re-signings and acquisitions.

    That's also a major factor in whether or not they seek to trade Tony Romo.

    Trading Romo before that June 1st deadline means they have to eat the full $19 million right away. They may be fine with that, though, especially if it means they're getting a player or draft pick of consequence to help them.

    Okay… maybe it's a little complicated, after all.

    The point here is that the Cowboys will NOT be anymore cap-strapped by moving Romo than if they kept him. In fact, they will have more flexibility than they would have otherwise. They can deal with his dead money cleanly and easily.

    Nothing to worry about.

    Jess Haynie
    Jess Haynie
    Cowboys fan since 1992, blogger since 2011. Bringing you the objectivity of an outside perspective with the passion of a die-hard fan. I love to talk to my readers, so please comment on any article and I'll be sure to respond!


    Cowboys remain resilient in statement win over the Giants

    It wouldn't truly be Thanksgiving without a side of...

    #DALvsNYG: 2nd-half adjustments gobble Giants up

    The Dallas Cowboys overcame a shaky first half and...

    DAL 28, NYG 20: Cowboys bounce back to claim a Thanksgiving Day victory

    After a rough first half, the Cowboys came out...

    Halftime Report: Shaky start for the Cowboys, Giants lead 13 – 7

    Giants were up first on offense but were forced...


    Daily Cowboys News in Your Inbox
    Your email address:*
    Please enter all required fields Click to hide
    Correct invalid entries Click to hide

    Trending Now

    Fantasy Outlook: It’s Hard to Trust any Cowboys Player Next Season

    I am already looking forward to my fantasy football...

    Cowboys Reveal New Uniforms for Week 17 vs Titans

    Another uniform emerges for the Dallas Cowboys to wear...

    Diggs Island – Trevon Diggs is entering elite status

    It’s hard to find a cornerback that is under...

    Why are the Dallas Cowboys Considered “America’s Team?”

    The Dallas Cowboys are one National Football League team...

    Will Jalen Tolbert suit up again this season?

    The third-round pick out of South Alabama has been...

    The Star: Getting Inside the Dallas Cowboys New Home

    The Dallas Cowboys star logo is one of the...

    Cowboys Nostalgia: Before Jerry Jones

    25 years ago Jerry Jones bought the Dallas Cowboys...

    Is Rush Hour Almost Over? Jerry Jones Suggests It Might Be

    Earlier in the week, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones indicated...

    What would a loss against the Vikings mean for Dak Prescott

    This year has been Rocky for Quarterback Dak Prescott. After a week one loss against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, he suffered a five-week thumb...

    How the Packers game affected the Cowboys season

    Last Sunday's loss against the Green Bay Packers was brutal, as it seemed to set the Cowboys back in the playoff race. But was...

    Cowboys football: Midseason grades for every postion group

    As we stand at the half-point of this year's NFL season, the Dallas Cowboys sit nice and pretty at 6-2. Personally, I never envisioned...


    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Tommy (@TommyVictorySec)

    again, any trade pre-June for Romo will need to include a day 2 pick or better. After June 1, trade will only occur IF a desperate team is willing to part with 2018 day 2 or better pick. Another possibility is trade with a team for starting DE in top 10.
    I highly doubt Cowboys will cut Romo.


    Why would you keep him as backup? So long as he’s healthy, Romo is a much better QB than Dak. Play Romo in 2017 for one last run at the Super Bowl then transition to Dak in 2018 or earlier if Romo gets hurt. Not exactly complicated

    Roger Pearson

    Would JJ want to keep Romo. Check 2015. How much does a 4-12 season cost the franchise? What is $24 million to JJ when what he wants is the last word on his legacy? Does JJ want another Emmitt or Ware sour taste? As a player-oriented and loyal owner, do you think he remembers Emmitt playing the Giants in that season’s do-or-die final game with only one arm and shoulder? Do you think he remembers Romo playing with a punctured lung and coming back too soon from his broken clavicle (and not telling the coaches to give him max protection)? The answer is a no brainer. BTW, is Romo really injury prone given the supporting cast he played with all these years? If your memory still fails, check Sam Bradford.

    Jason W.

    Dallas will not get anything more than a 3rd for Romo. It’s not because of talent. It’s because if he does become a free agent, the highest compensatory pick we could get is a 3rd. That’s why NE shipped Collins to CLE for a third. If Collins hot the open market, he likely would command a deal that warrants a 3rd comp pick.

    If DAL does not get an offer to land AT LEAST a 3rd Rd pick, then I wouldn’t deal Romo or cut him. If we take almost a $20m cap hit, keep him until 2018, when his dead money becomes $8.9m.

    A team will not offer anything substantial for a 36 yr old QB with a long history of injury. People will point to the Bradford deal but that’s not equivalent. Bradford wasn’t making $20m and isn’t 36.


    Ok so you say Bayless has his ‘head up his ass’ about the extra cap money, and then you proceed to explain why he’s correct. Do you read your own articles?