As I said before , i agree with Tony , now look TALENT may not be the right word to use so the word i'd use IF the cowboys draft these defensive guys I've heard about and they live somewhat up to expectations , the cowboys will be one of the most COMPLETE teams in the NFL , 3WR1s , better than average TEs , 2 decent RBs , a QB which is debatable how good he is but i think he's better than average , an O-Line WHEN they are able to stay healthy somewhat is better than average , and a D that i believe will be average to above average next year with these rookies , they're one of the most COMPLETE teams out there which is why i'm adamant about tagging Dak so that we will get a real gauge as to how good or bad he is , I don't want to pay him and then find out next year he's just a more mobile Kirk Cousins and we're screwed with monster contract for 4 or so years

It's like the question of which comes first , the chicken or the egg ? Dak hasn't proven that he's worth the price he's looking for and yet we supposed to do that anyways ?

It sounds like one of those ppl that go on Shark Tank with this idea and is asking for a insane evaluation when their sales are like nothing , and you know what happens ? THEY NEVER GET A DEAL , and yet that's EXACTLY WHAT WE SUPPOSE TO DO apparently