Cowboys Draft for Future; What Does it Mean for Jason Garrett?

May 1, 2019
2
3 mins read
Jason Garrett

Many have come away from the 2019 NFL Draft feeling that the Dallas Cowboys drafted more the future than for the upcoming season. If that’s true, then what does that say about the job security of Head Coach Jason Garrett?

Garrett is entering the final year of his current contract, and it’s been reported that the team doesn’t plan to extend him until sometime during or after the 2019 season. That has naturally led to speculation that Jason’s future in Dallas depends on how the team performs this year.

But usually, when a coach is fighting for his life, you’d see that reflected in the team’s personnel moves. The urgency of now tends to show up in the draft.

This 2019 class didn’t show that urgency. Areas where the team could’ve used some immediate help, such as safety or tight end, were passed over for more long-sighted picks at defensive tackle and especially offensive line.

That Connor McGovern pick in the third round really stands out in this discussion of “long-term vs. 2019” thinking. Dallas could’ve gone after a player who might have a significant impact on the upcoming season, but instead took a backup offensive lineman whose bets value will probably come in 2020 and beyond.

Again, what does that say about Jason Garrett’s future?

It’s important to acknowledge that Garrett doesn’t have final say in draft picks. The Jones family will be here longer than Jason, and perhaps scouting boss Will McClay as well, so their goals for a draft may be separate from their commitment to the current head coach.

Michael Lombardi Misses The Point With Unfair Jason Garrett Criticism
Dallas Cowboys Owner Jerry Jones and Head Coach Jason Garrett

But we all know how badly Jerry Jones wants for Jason Garrett to be the guy who takes Dallas back to the Super Bowl. It would be the vindication Jerry’s longed for since parting ways with Jimmy Johnson; his handpicked coach returning the Cowboys to glory with the team they built together.

Another consideration is that the Cowboys already looked like a championship contender even before the draft. With the development of young talent, Travis Frederick returning, and free agent additions such as Robert Quinn and Randall Cobb, the roster was already seemingly stronger than last year’s playoff team.

Management may have felt that they’ve already given Jason Garrett more than enough to get the job done in 2019, so they took a more long-term view towards the draft.

Again, not giving Garrett an extension beyond this season says a ton. Dallas clearly wants to see how things go before they make any commitments, and that is its own form of indictment.

But by not throwing every resource into 2019, which includes the use of their draft picks, the Cowboys are also saying that they have faith in Jason Garrett to succeed with the roster they’ve built. If you’re going to read one as an indictment, consistency demands that you read the other as an endorsement.

Maybe rookies like Trysten Hill, Connor McGovern, and Tony Pollard will have more immediate impact than I’m giving them credit. Maybe they’ll be part of what pushes the modern era Cowboys to new heights, and helps Garrett secure his future.

From coaches to players to executives to fans, the long wait begins to see what the 2019 season means for all parties.

Jess Haynie

Jess Haynie

Cowboys fan since 1992, blogger since 2011. Bringing you the objectivity of an outside perspective with the passion of a die-hard fan. I love to talk to my readers, so please comment on any article and I'll be sure to respond!

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chuck Wright
Chuck Wright
May 1, 2019 11:34 AM

Really weird draft for me. Cooper and Hill were home runs in hte 1st and 2nd. Without cooper we would 100% be “drafting for the future) in the 15-20 range.

Immediate should mean year 1 and by that measure, passing on some of the safeties in the 3rd round was foolish. I get McGovern had “great value” but he like most of the other picks were STs players for 2019 at best.

I’m not as high on the draft as others. 2 RBs but no TEs? along with S made no sense to me. The S we did take is a liability in coverage per most scouting reports.

Steve
Steve
May 1, 2019 6:15 PM
Reply to  Chuck Wright

Yeah I agree that this draft being that we only had 6 picks and made trades to turn them into 8 (9) counting Cooper wasn’t our best draft in yrs or so it seems?? Of course saying Cooper is 1st was a HR of a pick (Trade) and Jerry will sign him for at least 5/6 more yrs! Now Hill could be a beast for the middle of our Dline. Looking forward to his high motor (Nasty) kind of play! McGovern was a safety pick and IMO was a really good one, he can be insurance at center even though we have Looney and I really don’t see Looney staying after the man started all 16 games last yr and did admirably at that. Just don’t see a Starter staying with the team as long as Fredrick can maintain his health and play! Who knows Looney could end up being traded. McGovern will be like Williams last yr and learn and then be able to take on LG or RT next yr and let Collins walk. Can’t pay every position top notch money and they had to find ways to be able to allow players learn and develop a yr before sticking them in right out of the gate, like Williams did last yr and struggled for 2/3’s of the year and then turned it on the last few games and playoffs! Seriously Dallas is in the best shape they have been in years and I’m enjoying it…

The Positives and Negatives After Three Weeks
Next Story

The Positives and Negatives After 3 Weeks