The next NFL league meeting is scheduled to begin one week from today: March 26 – 29 in Phoenix, AZ. Recently, the NFL released details of nine proposed rule changes submitted by seven different clubs.
The potential changes will be voted on during the league meeting at the end of the month. Two particular proposals stand out among the rest:
- The proposal to be able to review roughing the passer calls
- The proposal for teams to be able to retain possession of the ball after scoring
REVIEWABLE ROUGHING THE PASSER CALLS
The Los Angeles Rams submitted a proposal to amend Rule 15, Sections 1 and 3. Those sections currently cover coaches’ challenges and replay reviews.
The Rams’ three-and-a-half-page proposal would improve competitive equity, according to its authors.
To cover their bases, the Rams added language referencing the review of roughing the passer calls to three different articles of the rule book.
The fairness and objectivity of rough-the-passer calls came under scrutiny when the frequency of calls seemed to increase after the public and scary image of Dolphins Quarterback Tua Tagovailoa seizing up on the field seemingly due to head trauma after a hit.
Even the Cowboys’ own Micah Parsons commented publicly about his frustrations with the calls.
The option to challenge and review roughing the passer calls might give officials a chance to examine the legality of a hit rather than making a call based only on their initial perception of force or intensity.
RETAINING POSSESSION AFTER A SCORE
It was the Philadelphia Eagles who proposed an option for teams to retain possession of the ball after scoring.
Adoption of their proposal would mean that after a touchdown or successful field goal, instead of a kick-off, teams would have one opportunity to move the ball from their own 20-yard line to their 40-yard line; basically a 4th-and-20 situation from their own 20.
If the team converts, play would continue as normal with the team retaining possession and the next spot of the ball occurring as usual.
If a team failed to convert, however, the opposing team would start their next drive from wherever the previous play ended, which would be considerably closer to the end zone.
Additionally, as their proposal is written, teams would not be able to change their decision and opt for a kickoff if the offense commits a penalty that puts them even deeper into their own territory.
This rule change is possibly inspired by the XFL.
According to XFL rules, scoring teams may retain possession of the ball if they move the ball 15 yards from their own 25-yard line in one attempt. This rule only applies to the 4th quarter of XFL games.
The Eagles did not limit the application of this proposed rule to a specific quarter. As written, it would apply to the entire game.
The Eagles cited competitive equity and fan engagement as the reasons for their proposal.
No, they should not. We need to try out our defense after we score. Just retaining possession would make onside kicks useless.
Reviewing plays is one thing. Maintai ing possession is just changing the game. Totally stupid. It’s like breaking a record with 17 games and thinking you are better than those that held the record with 16 games.
No, games are long enough now, and no to anything proposed by the Eagles. BTW, did they outlaw that ridiculous rugby-like push the QB rule yet?
Not gonna lie, that nonsense about retaining possession might be the dumbest thing I’ve heard proposed in NFL history. As far as reviews go, every play should be eligable to be reviewed. Why some plays are and some aren’t doesn’t make any sense.
Why would you award a team that has been losing a game all day, with a way to score 14 points and steal a game? Are we talking pro football or pinball? Stupid idea, I can’t believe a team in this league even mentioned something like this. The XFL is trying to prepare players for the NFL, not the other way around.