I have heard the Dak stat padding argument for years. It is one of the laziest conversations around the Dallas Cowboys.
If you want to criticize Dak Prescott, there is plenty to bring up. The playoff record, turnovers in big moments, the Cowboys coming up short when expectations are the highest.
Those are all things that usually get put on a quarterback and Dak isn’t getting away from them.
Calling Dak a stat-padder is crazy.
I think most of you have watched enough football to know what stat-padding looks like. A quarterback down three scores throwing underneath routes against a defense protecting the sideline is stat padding.
https://twitter.com/BetMGM/status/1992735684390691271?s=20
A quarterback collecting easy completions after the outcome has already been decided is stat-padding. Unless it’s against the Eagles, if it is run that score up.
Dak didn’t do that last season.
On throws of 10 or more yards downfield, Prescott threw for 2,371 yards, 15 touchdowns, five interceptions, and a 114.9 passer rating.
Those are throws that require anticipation, timing, ball placement, and the willingness to attack a defense past the sticks.
Dak Was Attacking Downfield
The easiest way I can think of to dismiss a quarterback’s production is to claim it all came on screens and checkdowns.
The problem with that is Dak’s numbers don’t support the argument.
On throws between 10 and 19 yards, Prescott completed 72-118 passes for 1,221 yards, seven touchdowns, and two interceptions. He posted a passer rating north of 117 in that area of the field.
Those aren’t easy throws.
We know those throws are over linebackers and in front of safeties. Those are throws where quarterbacks trust what they see and let it rip.
When people say Dak only puts up numbers when it doesn’t matter, these are the numbers they usually ignore.
The Deep Ball Wasn’t The Problem
The deep passing numbers were just as impressive.
On throws of 20 or more yards downfield, Prescott completed 33 passes for 1,150 yards, eight touchdowns, and three interceptions while posting a 111.2 passer rating.
For years, it felt like one of the biggest complaints on him was that he is too conservative. The 2025 numbers show a different story.
He was pushing the ball down the field and producing when he did it. Were there mistakes? Of course. There always are when a quarterback takes chances downfield.
A quarterback who is padding stats is not usually generating over 1,100 yards and eight touchdowns on deep throws.
Play Action Was Dak At His Best
The stat that jumped off the page for me was what Dak did off the play action. We all know Dak is good off the play action, but did you know he is one of the best in the NFL?
In 2025, Prescott completed 125 of 166 passes for 1,452 yards, 14 touchdowns, zero interceptions, and a 129.4 passer rating on play action.
You read that right: 14 touchdowns and no interceptions. As Cowboys fans, we have asked for this offense to make life easier for the quarterback. Play action does that when it is used correctly.
When Dallas leaned into it, Prescott rewarded them. He completed more than 75% of his passes, averaged 8.7 yards per attempt, and never put the ball in harms way.
Dak Beat The Blitz Too
There is another stat that doesn’t fit the stat-padding label.
When defenses blitzed Prescott in 2025, he completed 70.5 percent of his passes for 1,662 yards, seven touchdowns, two interceptions, and a 104.5 passer rating.
Dak handled the pressure well.
If his production was built on easy throws and favorable situations, pressure would expose it. Instead, he remained productive while defenses tried to make him uncomfortable.
That does not mean he was perfect. Nobody is.
It does mean the idea that his numbers were empty falls apart pretty quickly.
Criticize Dak For The Right Things
I understand why Cowboys fans get frustrated with Dak Prescott. I get frustrated with him too.
This fan base has been waiting a long time for a postseason breakthrough, and until it happens, the criticism won’t go anywhere. That comes with being the quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys.
Saying Dak needs to be better in the playoffs if fair, but it’s not all on him. Saying he needs to protect the football in big moments, I can get behind that. But calling him a stat-padder is something he is not.
The numbers we looked at are not garbage time numbers. Those are the numbers of a quarterback attacking defenses and making plays in some of the toughest areas of the field.
Dak has plenty to prove, but the stat-padding argument is not one of them.
Was this helpful?
1 Comment