Can The Cowboys Keep Their Linebacker Corps Intact?

3
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly for Cowboys against Philadelphia
PHILADELPHIA, PA - NOVEMBER 11: Outside linebacker Leighton Vander Esch #55 of the Dallas Cowboys celebrates making an interception against quarterback Carson Wentz #11 of the Philadelphia Eagles (not pictured) during the first quarter at Lincoln Financial Field on November 11, 2018 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

This might become the weakest unit on the defensive side of the ball for the Cowboys in 2023: The linebackers. Leighton Vander Esch had his best year yet, even after missing three games due to injury.

He was playing on a one-year, $2 million dollar contract. Which makes Vander Esch a free agent this year and from the sounds of things, the two sides are far apart on terms.

Inside linebackers that make an impact don’t grow on trees.

So the question is: Can the Cowboys live without him?

Leighton Vander Esch Is A Stud, And Should Be For A Long Time

If the answer is no, then the next question becomes, do they have the money to keep him?

A lot of that depends on how well the Cowboys can trim off some of the cash from other contracts. For now, we’ll look at both options.

WILL HE STAY OR WILL HE GO

If the two sides can’t make a deal they can both live with and the Boise State grad hits the road, who replaces him at the Mike?

Right now that would fall to a pair of young players out of LSU — Damone Clark and Jabril Cox.

Their combined salary is just over $2 million, about the same as what Vander Esch played for last season. So, they are the more financially solid option, freeing money up to spend elsewhere.

But are they the best option on the field?

Micah Parsons, Jabril Cox Given Highest Run Defense Grades for Rookie LBs by Pro Football Focus

Clark had a decent season in his rookie year. Cox has seen limited action in his two years in Dallas.

Of the two, Clark seems to be the most likely to succeed Vander Esch, barring a free agent signing. Unless the Cowboys land a Henry To’oto’o or someone similar in the draft instead.

But that is a lot of pressure to put on a young player, especially given the big shoes he’ll have to fill. Which puts Vander Esch in the driver’s seat in contract negotiations.

It’ll come down to if the Cowboys can find the money and still address their other needs.

SPEAKING OF WILL…

Anthony Barr filled the role nicely for the Cowboys in 2022, and for less than $2 million. But he too is going to be a free agent.

He’ll likely be moving on with either Clark or Cox taking his spot.

If Vander Esch also moves on, the two Tigers from Baton Rouge are going to have to grow up very fast in 2023.

THE MICAH PARSONS PROJECT

Micah Parsons is officially listed as an outside linebacker on the depth charts. But he does the most damage moving around the line and attacking the quarterback.

He is safely signed through 2024 with an option for 2025 that will likely be taken.

Parsons provides the lone island of stability in the linebackers room in 2023.

Where Was Micah Parsons in the Giants Game? 1

No matter how contract negotiations play out in the weeks to come, there is going to be a new set of starting linebackers in 2023.

How Dan Quinn manages to mold that unit together might be his biggest challenge this year.

THE SOLUTION

We know Parsons is there, an anchor the Cowboys will lean heavily on. If they can find the money they should keep Vander Esch, target a linebacker in the third round, and let Barr go.

Personally, I’d let them both go and target a linebacker in the second round or third if it looks like the right player will fall to them there. This means Clark and Cox will be expected to elevate their games.

Both played in the SEC. Clark was on the 2019 National Championship team. They know what top-level football looks like.

In 2023 they both may be forced to prove they know how to play top-level football. If Vander Esch leaves, and they can’t rise to the challenge, the Cowboys’ defense will take a huge step backward.

Was this helpful?

Richard Paolinelli is an award-winning sports journalist with 34 years of professional newsroom experience. His newspaper career (1991–2011) includes the Gallup Independent, Modesto Bee, Gustine Press-Standard, Turlock Journal, Merced Sun-Star, Tracy Press, Patch, and San Francisco Examiner. He received the 2001 California Newspaper Publishers Association Best Sports Story award. Richard has authored two non-fiction sports books and 11 novels. At InsideTheStar.com, he has published 874 articles reaching over 728,000 readers.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lawrence
Lawrence
Mar 9, 2023 6:51 AM

Hello Richard! I think the Cowboys should let Barr and Vander Esch walk. They’re both empty shirts in my opinion . There’s Linebacker talent in this upcoming draft. Jack Campbell from Iowa is one of my favorites. He’s better than both Barr and Vander Esch right now. If Clark and Cox can’t crack the starting lineup then they need to draft ano another Outside Linebacker that can play. Vander Esch had his best season as a rookie. It’s been a steady decline from that point to the present.

Sean
Sean
Mar 9, 2023 9:12 AM

I think that Cowboys should what they have always done in this situation. The should let Vanderesch go test free agency to see his reality. I would be surprised if another franchise would be willing to give him over 3 million per year, max. There is a good group of linebackers in this years draft. Anyone that can shed blocks and make tackles is the best preferred.

VAM
VAM
Mar 9, 2023 2:16 PM

Agree Richard, this LB room is a bit unsettled. LVE was a bargain and earned his two million last year with a pretty productive season, with 90 total tackles while missing 3 games (which is down from his 140 in rookie year). His downside is he is injury prone. Clark also had a neck injury problem, and Cox also has missed time and surprisingly has just 8 total tackles in two years. If they let LVE walk, what’s the confidence level of getting a solid replacement from Clark/Cox is the question. They may have to dip into the draft for insurance.