Could Refocusing College Picks Benefit The Cowboys?

Jul 26, 2018
1
2 mins read
Could Refocusing College Picks Benefit The Cowboys?

It was revealed earlier this month that the Dallas Cowboys are once again the most valuable football brand in the world, with a turnover of $4.8 billion. However, this has raised questions of why success isn’t forthcoming, with that elusive Super Bowl still waiting. When you cast an eye over the winners from the past few years, a detail sticks out: how the draft process is being played out.

Like in the UK with soccer’s Manchester United, it’s proven that a high turnover doesn’t guarantee success. The proof might be in targeted drafting and generating a strategy that revolves around focusing on the best programs. Homemade players sometimes feel the best for the fans, but as Ezekiel Elliott has shown, some of the key players are from outside the local program.

The successful colleges and their attributes

To get an idea of where the best talent comes from, you need to look at the colleges of the winners. For that, there are few people who would object to calling Alabama the strongest football college, with 44 Alabama alumni in the NFL, as reported by Business Insider. What makes them tick?

Obviously, there is the quality of the training and facilities.

Like Florida, Alabama has elite training facilities and training methods. However, many other states lay claim to this, too, and while the win record of Alabama teams is laudable, that doesn’t necessarily generate NFL players.

Part of the reason that Alabama does so well is around the student life and the cost of living. As Alabama is the fifth cheapest place to live in the USA, this gives students the flexibility to relax and focus on both their studies and football, ultimately developing into superior players.

Where the Cowboys could make an impact

To credit the Cowboys, their draft strategy seems to have taken a nod to today’s powerhouses of college football. 2018 has seen the arrival of Bo Scarbrough from Alabama, Xavier Woods arrived in 2017 from talent-heavy Louisiana, in addition to Ohio’s Noah Brown. Taking a look at the draft picks of other teams could hint at where the direction is headed, and how the Cowboys might benefit.

The form of Georgia State has seen the Patriots draft two players concurrently, and have seen – alongside Florida – their birth rate for NFL players shoot up the rankings.

The highest rates of NFL talent come from the Southern states, Texas aside. These states also have some of the lowest cost of living rates in the country, outside of the larger conurbations, and provide real educational opportunities.

This is something Texas has moved toward, with SMU offering STEM fields to football students. Looking to their next drafts, the Cowboys could benefit from looking at these states and taking advantage of football students from the low-cost, high-win rate programs.

As the Cowboys search for further success and the holy grail, the Super Bowl, they might benefit from refocusing their draft strategy. Statistics show that some states are simply better than others, from a combination of their preferable quality of life and facilities.

With changes already being made, it might be that Dallas has better and better players coming through the draft every year.

Bryson Treece

Bryson Treece

Bryson Treece is the founder and managing editor of InsideTheStar.com, which he established in 2008, and its parent site, DailyRivals.net, a new sports blog network. With 18 years in sports media, he has published over 500 articles, been credentialed press at the 2016 NFL Draft in Arlington, TX, and built Inside The Star into an established independent source for Dallas Cowboys news and analysis. Based in Greenville, Texas, Bryson oversees website and editorial operations, and content strategy. Connect with @CowboysNation on X/Twitter to join the conversation.

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fighter15
Fighter15
Jul 26, 2018 4:39 PM

That might be, no it definitely is, the biggest nonsequitur argument of all time regarding NFL talent ever written.

The fact is California, Texas and Florida have the most players might just be that they are 1, 2, 3 in populations?

College football is recruiting first. Coaching second. (Let’s just pretend money is not involved) And if you believe Tuscaloosa or Gainesville are attractive because of quality of life you have never been there. Its like saying people go to Baylor for Waco. [Shudder and gag]

Lastly your knowledge of the draft must be lacking. You draft in reverse order. Period. In pre-salary cap years free agency indeed included a few recruiting catches, but they’re not even top 10 consideration. It’s money, money, money, money, money, championships, money, money, money, astrology, then a whole bunch more (money)

I mean. Have you ever been to Green bay? Cleveland? (OK…that may actually make your case)

Please tell us this was a satirical post?

The Positives and Negatives After Three Weeks
Next Story

The Positives and Negatives After 3 Weeks